Plans for Hindu temple on former Burnell Arms site in Manor Park
A third attempt to seek permission to erect a new Hindu temple in East Ham has sparked objections from people living close by.
The Lakshmi Narayana Trust has proposed replacing the existing Sri Mahalakshmi Temple on High Street North with a two to three-storey building on the site of the former Burnell Arms.
The pub was burnt to the ground in 2009 and the site has since been surrounded by hoarding.
Residents in Byron Avenue and Plashet Grove have objected to the temple, and have expressed fears it would reduce light and increase the amount of traffic.
Dr Seeni Naidu, president of the trust, said their current base is no longer suitable because their congregation had grown in size.
You may also want to watch:
If they are able to move, they will rent out the Sri Mahalakshmi temple for commercial use.
He said: “Over the weekend our current temple becomes really crowded. It is not really suitable in terms of its structure.
- 1 'Dangerous and predatory' Newham man found guilty of child sex assault
- 2 Take a peek inside The Boleyn Tavern as it prepares to welcome punters
- 3 Seven charged after police crackdown on alleged county lines
- 4 Met launches summer operation as teen killings surge
- 5 Investigation launched after two young men stabbed in Newham
- 6 Free cultural events and family activities in the Royal Docks announced
- 7 The Boleyn Tavern in East Ham to welcome back punters after £1.5m restoration
- 8 Demand for urgent action as Newham lags behind in Covid-19 jabs
- 9 RuPaul's Drag Race UK star Bimini Bon Boulash makes Covid-19 jabs call at London Stadium pop-up clinic
- 10 US burger chain Wendy's set to open first London restaurant in Stratford
“The new application is going to have a smaller footprint but it will be entirely the same inside. The exact same congregation will be moved to a more suitable place.”
Proposals include a kitchen, dining room and toilets in the basement.
A prayer hall capable of fitting 200 people will be situated on the ground floor. A previous application for a new temple on the site was withdrawn in 2005 because of concerns over the size of the proposed building and an increase in
It was re-submitted in 2006 and approved. But it emerged that the temple’s previous management committee did not own the entire development site.