East Ham GP could be struck off
- Credit: central
A GP who told a mother of two with cancer that she had swollen glands faces being stuck off the medical register.
Dr Inayat Inayatullah saw Linda Geden at his Barking Road medical centre in East Ham in September 2002. She told him she had a lump about the size of a marble on her neck. Dr Inayattullah advsied her to take paracetamol.
Although Ms Geden returned to the surgery in November, she was told the same thing. She left in tears after the GP shouted at her and said she was wasting his time.
Ms Geden, from Plaistow, who registered with another doctor, was diagnosed with cancer in April 2003. Despite receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy she died in June 2006, aged 38.
Dr Inayatullah appeared before the General Medical Council in September 2006 and was subject to 13 conditions.
You may also want to watch:
Three years later, in 2009, he was allowed to work unrestricted.
In 2011 an investigation was launched after Dr Inayatullah was secretly filmed telling an undercover reporter to eat mangoes after he relayed symptoms of bowel cancer. The reporter, referred to as AC, was working for Channel 4’s Dispatches programme
- 1 East Ham barber disappointed by Covid-19 lockdown easing roadmap
- 2 Front-runners for Leyton Orient vacancy after Ross Embleton departure
- 3 Police investigate burglary and injury at 'cannabis' house
- 4 Traffic cameras installed to catch Newham drivers who ignore road signs
- 5 Foodbank offering lifeline to foreign students left destitute by pandemic
- 6 Eight-year-old girl from Canning Town publishes book to help children with grief
- 7 Man arrested in east London for terrorist offences
- 8 Guilty: Men from Forest Gate and East Ham who raped two women during brothel robbery
- 9 Upminster killer boasted about hacking teen to death with machete in street
- 10 Person found dead on tracks at Plaistow Underground station
Now, the GP is facing a fitness to practice panel in Manchester on the basis of consultations he carried out with two ‘patients’, both of whom were undercover reporters.
The panel ruled that he should have obtained additional details about patient AC’s rectal bleeding when he told him he was suffering from stomach pain, constipation and passing blood.
The panel also said he “had an obligation to carry out a rectal examination”. Instead the GP made a diagnosis of constipation. The GP recorded in his notes that he had carried out an examination while the video footage did not show him doing so. The panel the doctor had acted dishonestly.
The panel now has to consider whether his fitness to practice impaired and what sanctions to impose. It has a range of sanctions which include suspending his registration or erase his name from the register, meaning he can no longer practice.