East Ham father-of-six is the first trader to be jailed for selling illegal skin lightening products
- Credit: PA
A shopkeeper from East Ham has become the first trader to be jailed for selling illegal and toxic skin lightening products.
Mohammed Iqbal Bharodawala, 45, of Heigham Road, was sentenced yesterday to 20 months after he admitted nine charges of selling the products which contain banned ingredient hydroquinone.
Inner London Crown Court heard the father-of-six also admitted 15 charges relating to inadequate labelling of the harmful products, which were confiscated by Southwark Council in January.
The businessman, who owns Jenny’s Cosmetics Limited in Walworth, south east London, was also disqualified from being a company director for four years, and the company fined £1,500.
His 35-year-old brother, Abdul Kadar Bharodawala, who ran shop Jenny’s Online Ltd, was sentenced to 80 hours unpaid work and the company fined £500.
His charges related to the marketing of products containing hydroquinone and a failure to label them properly.
Hydroquinone causes skin damage and is linked to damage of the liver and nervous system.
- 1 Wanted: Five people Newham police wish to speak to
- 2 'Suspicious' Forest Gate construction fire under investigation
- 3 Teenager from Newham found safe and well
- 4 The ex-gang member who turned from crime to become a pastor mentoring young people
- 5 Burglars jailed for violent Upminster burglary where boy, 11, was shot
- 6 Gainsborough Avenue stabbing: 14-year-old boy charged
- 7 Moyes: Fantastic to secure European football again
- 8 Pensioner dies after being critically injured in East Ham crash
- 9 Tomorrow's lunar eclipse: How and when to see it
- 10 Two arrests after multi-vehicle crash on Barking Road
It was banned in 2001.
Judge Freya Newbery, sentencing, told the defendants: “There’s no doubt that you knew what your obligations were as a distributor of cosmetics products and you should not have been marketing products which contained banned substances, especially hydroquinone.
“I’m quite satisfied you knew exactly what you were selling and sourced them for the people who wanted to buy them from you.
Citing research by Southwark Council’s Trading Standards, she added: “It’s relevant that... a desire for fairer skin is driven by deep-rooted complex and social, cultural and historical reasons.
“Here, it seems to me that the marketing and sale of products you were engaged in exploits anxieties and sensitivities of women and men who are culturally and socially motivated to purchase those products which lighten their skin and risk causing damage in the process.”
An inspection by Southwark Council in January led to 260 items being seized from the shop floor and stockroom at Bharodawala’s store.
A test purchase of three products on eBay revealed similar products were also being sold by Jenny’s Online Limited run by father-of-four Abdul.
Of the items purchased online, a Grace Duo lightening cream was found to contain 17.6% hydroquinone after being sent for analysis.
Some of the products seized also failed to display the names and addresses of a manufacturer, breaching EU regulation.
Mohammed , was previously handed down a 12-month suspended sentence and £1,300 fine in November 2015 for similar offences.
Prosecuting, Richard Heller said: “Mohammed would have been well aware of his obligation as a distributor of the product, having been prosecuted for similar offences.
“It is the Crown’s case that the products were intentionally sold in the knowledge that they should not be.”
The court also heard how Mohammed had applied for an application to have his company struck off, and that he had recently changed the name of his shop to Jenny’s Hair and Wigs.
The majority of previous cases have resulted in financial penalties.
Councillor Evelyn Akoto, of Southwark Council, said: “It’s sending out a strong message to all the vendors of illegal skin lightening creams that we are actively pursuing you, we are actively going to seek you out and prosecute you as and when we find you.
“It is also a clear message to those using the product that they shouldn’t use it, one because it’s illegal and two, because of the serious side-effects that this cream produces.”
She added that the case was an impetus for the council’s trading standards to keep fighting “because we know that this is just the tip of the iceberg”