Iranian asylum-seeker in age claim puzzle
An orphaned asylum-seeker whose claim to be schoolboy when he arrived in Britain was disbelieved by Newham social workers has failed to convince a judge he is still a child.
The boy, or man, known only as “G” said he was 15 when he �arrived from Iran in April 2008.
He demanded to be given �special consideration, including benefits and schooling.
He gave social workers a “timeline”, including leaving school at nine, when his mother died.
He backed up his claim with a vaccination certificate which gave his birth as 1371 under Iran’s �calendar, or 1993 in the West.
You may also want to watch:
After a detailed “age assessment” was carried out last year taking into account his maturity, �demeanour and other factors, Newham insisted he was not 17, as then claimed, but between 21 and 25, London’s Appeal Court heard.
His age was of critical importance as, if he was a child when he arrived, he would be entitled to a wider range of benefits and services and to have his asylum claim considered under a more generous policy. His barrister, Shu Shin Luh, said he had given a consistent account of his childhood and experts agreed that the vaccination �certificate was genuine.
Most Read
- 1 Jailed man caught with knife in Stratford to be handed court order
- 2 Cause of death remains unknown after body found in disused Forest Gate pub
- 3 Worshippers at mosque in Upton Park aim to raise £35k for Royal British Legion's Poppy Appeal 2021
- 4 Tom Hiddleston to appear as MCM Comic Con returns to ExCeL London in Royal Docks
- 5 Body found in derelict pub in Forest Gate
- 6 Hundreds arrested after police crackdown on county lines
- 7 Forest Gate triple shooting: 'Safety is everybody's business,' councillor says
- 8 Thames Barrier closing for 200th time amid potential east London flooding
- 9 Man given community order for 26 counts of criminal damage after scratching name into property
- 10 Charity provides free breakfasts for 561 vulnerable families over half term
But, rejecting his challenge, Lord Justice Sullivan said the Newham assessment was “a pretty thorough exercise” and he was “nowhere near being a child”.
The council’s assessment had to be “very wrong indeed” if he was to win the argument, said the judge, who described that as an “insuperable difficulty” to his case.
