Councillors criticise loss of £52m after Newham Council gives up London Stadium ownership

The London Stadium Picture: Ken Mears

The London Stadium Picture: Ken Mears - Credit: Archant

Councillors have criticised the loss of more than £52 million as a result of the London Stadium’s ownership being transferred to the Mayor of London.

The decision for Newham Council to relinquish its role in the E20 company was made following an independent review by Moore Stephens into the stadium’s finances, commissioned by Sadiq Khan.

As part of the deal, the council accepted that the original investment of £40 million into the stadium business, plus a further £12.2m in working capital, will not be repaid.

In return for handing over control, it will receive what has been termed as “community and regeneration benefits” for the next 100 years, including free tickets to residents.

Concerns had been raised in September, when the loan was “impaired” by the council’s investment and accounts committee - meaning the loan cannot currently be paid back due to the poor financial performance of the stadium. At the time, the council had denied it had been “written off”.

You may also want to watch:

Newham Legacy Investments Limited, a subsidiary company wholly-owned by the local authority, owed £44.4m after declaring a loss of £41.6m from 2015 to 2016, and a £2.5m loss from 2016 to 2017.

But worries over the investment go back to before the Olympics had even taken place.

Most Read

The Recorder has learnt that about a third of councillors present at a 2011 meeting raised concerns about the £40m loan.

Minutes from an extraordinary meeting of council, which took place in January of that year as a private session, record that 49 councillors voted for the loan to be approved, with none against and no abstentions. The remaining councillors were listed as being absent or not present - some of whom were ineligible to vote due to a conflict of interest.

Cllr Rokhsana Fiaz, who had not been elected when the 2011 vote took place, said: “I think it raises some serious questions about governance.

“Free tickets and community events for 100 years is not a substitute for the £52m we invested which we won’t get back.

“A huge amount of money desperately needed for Newham residents now in light of financial challenges the council currently faces.

“As a chair of scrutiny in Newham, I have called for an urgent inquiry about what went wrong with the council’s own governance arrangements to mitigate risks in the joint venture with the LLDC as clearly the council dropped the ball on this one.”

Cllr Conor McAuley, who branded the stadium a “money pit”, was a member of the Olympic Delivery Authority Planning Committee, so was not allowed to participate in the 2011 vote due to a conflict of interest.

“For Sir Robin (Mayor of Newham) to blame it all on Boris Johnson (former Mayor of London) is outrageous,” he said. “It takes two people to do a deal.”

He criticised the audit committee’s decision to impair the loan, saying: “We all knew that money was never coming back. What we didn’t know was that it wasn’t £44m, it was £52m.”

Cllr Julianne Marriott added: “I raised concerns about £44m being ‘impaired’ at the council’s audit committee two months ago.

“After being assured our loan was not being written off, I was not impressed to find out that is exactly what has happened.”

A spokeswoman for Newham Council said: “The loan was impaired in our 2016/17 accounts as the future returns from E20 were uncertain at that time.

“Now that the council has, effectively, withdrawn from E20 and our £40m investment will not be repaid , we are closing Newham Legacy Investments.

“As part of the deal agreed by the Mayors of London and Newham, the community benefits - including free football tickets, free hire for community days at the stadium and jobs targets – will transfer from E20 (the 65:35 LLDC and council joint venture) to NLI and then to the council itself.

“As part of the closure of NLI, our £40m investment (which in our accounts already has a nil value) will be converted to shares in NLI. This will show as such in our 2017/18 accounts.

“Our return for the £40m investment will come through the value of the community benefits over the next 100 years and means that the investment is not written off.”

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter
Comments powered by Disqus