Big Debate: Is enough being done to tackle extremism on university campuses?
- Credit: Getty Images
This week we ask whether enough is being done to tackle extremism on university campuses?
With the Liberal Democrats no longer holding her back, Home Secretary Theresa May is taking on terrorism by resurrecting her 2014 anti-extremism bill. It was criticised at the time by her colleague Sajid Javid, now Secretary of State for Business, as stifling free speech. The bill outlines her intention to ban extremist speakers from university campuses. This week we ask: Is enough being done to tackle extremism on university campuses?
To share your views simply vote in our poll, leave your comments below or on our Facebook and Twitter pages. Or you can contact Sebastian Murphy-Bates at email@example.com and 020 8477 5802, or send a letter in to firstname.lastname@example.org
Abdul Khan of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Association
I am a Muslim by birth and a member of Ahmadiyya Muslim Association (AMA).
You may also want to watch:
AMA has a track record of being a peaceful organisation across the globe and representative of true Islamic teachings.
I support every effort being made to counter terrorism in its all forms. However, I also accept that the presumption of innocence should be respected and there must not be any unreasonable limitations on freedom of expression.
- 1 Jailed man caught with knife in Stratford to be handed court order
- 2 Tom Hiddleston to appear as MCM Comic Con returns to ExCeL London in Royal Docks
- 3 Cause of death remains unknown after body found in disused Forest Gate pub
- 4 Worshippers at mosque in Upton Park aim to raise £35k for Royal British Legion's Poppy Appeal 2021
- 5 Forest Gate triple shooting: 'Safety is everybody's business,' councillor says
- 6 Body found in derelict pub in Forest Gate
- 7 Hundreds arrested after police crackdown on county lines
- 8 Thames Barrier closing for 200th time amid potential east London flooding
- 9 Car abandoned after triple shooting and stabbing at Forest Gate barber
- 10 Westfield Stratford City reopens after shop fire caused by electrical fault
According to the holy Qur’an, the value of an innocent life is so high that if someone kills an innocent person, it is the same as killing the human race.
Therefore, it is a duty of people in authority to ensure that every innocent person has the best possible protection to live a peaceful life.
Anyone promoting goodness shall have no limits on his freedom of expression, but freedom of expression is limited for those who create disorder in the society as this is the most disgraceful act to be carried out.
The Qur’an says anyone who does so may be expelled from the land.
It also says that, in dealing with such matters, people in authority must not discriminate and let a people’s enmity incite them to act otherwise than with justice and they must not set punishments beyond what is deserved for any particular act.
Some have suggested the bill threatens free speech at universities, restricts academic freedom, and will make debate on unpopular issues difficult.
I don’t agree as having academic research and debate or discussion on issues like terrorism is different from committing, promoting or glorifying terrorism. And it is not difficult to see the difference.
According to the holy Qur’an, one should adopt anything which has more benefit than loss.
And I feel that, in adopting the bill, there are more benefits than loss. I fully support the bill, as it does not stifle freedom of expression for good.
David Thorpe, 2015’s East Ham Lib Dem candidate
No government can be said to be doing its job if it cannot protect the citizens it has been elected to serve.
But neither can any government claim to be serving its citizens properly if it restricts their right to be curious and challenge the world in which they live.
The problem with the legislation Theresa May is proposing to resuscitate now that the Conservatives govern alone and cannot be prevented from implementing it, as it was in the last by the Liberal Democrats, is that it serves neither to reduce the threat of terrorism to the citizens of Newham, nor to protect the “British values” that underscore her rhetoric on the issue.
By restricting the rights of universities to invite speakers who represent “extreme views”, the government will simply add to the mystique and allure of such characters.
Students have always been attracted to rebellion. The more a viewpoint is proscribed by a government, the more likely it is teenagers will be drawn to those views,.
Rather than accessing those views in the academic, open atmosphere of a university, students will find other ways.
For any students vulnerable to exploitation, those less mainstream channels for hearing extreme views could lead to genuine danger.
But perhaps the biggest reason to object to the Tory plans is that, quite simply, they are un-British.
This country has achieved a place of genuine eminence in the cultural, economic and intellectual development of the world.
That prominence is a consequence of the free thinking of its populace, from the liberals Adam Smith and David Hume, to the socialist Karl Marx and the ability of those great minds to test and challenge orthodoxies.
Once a brake is put on those freedoms for one person or group, every other group and individual, whatever their politics, is immediately less free.